Andi Kleen wrote:

On 07 Apr 2004 08:24:19 -0400
jamal [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The patch does look clean and attractive. I havent had time toi play
with it myself - but given the way gettimeofday has been torturing me
i will at some point. Also if you have time a 2.4.x patch would be

Thanks. All feedback I received so far was positive. I hope DaveM will
merge it soon. I don't have plans to work on 2.4 anymore.

I finally got around to working with 2.6, and I ran into the
new timestamp code.  I would like to be able to have timestamps
even though I do not have a socket structure (I am using a kernel
module to grab all frames)...

How would you feel about either exporting the netstamp_needed variable
or offering a method that explicitly incremented or decremented the
use count?

Thanks,
Ben

-Andi

-- 
Ben Greear [off-list ref]
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com