In article [ref] (at Mon, 21 Jun 2004 22:04:20 +0200), maximilian attems [off-list ref] says:
doesn't seem to be enough,
because if (tb == NULL) fn_hash_kmem won't be freed,
or am i overseeing something?
I believe fn_hash_kmem is not required to (and should not) be freed even
if kmalloc() fails for the new table.
Users in existing table should be able to continue using fn_hash_kmem.
--yoshfuji