Re: RFC: Network Device Driver Group proposal
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Date: 2004-05-24 21:17:32
Luis R. Rodriguez [off-list ref] : [...]
on drivers. Basically I feel we are doing great but we're lacking that *corporate* entity any commercial operating system has. Who do manufacturers seek out to provide/sell source base/NDA's to so that a driver can be written for our OS? No one... On behalf of who does a kernel hacker send out an e-mail to a company requesting specs to write a driver? The DRI/Xfree86 project have an advantage because of this -- they represent a group who has done tons of great work and companies tend to trust groups more than individuals. Of course, many companies
May I suggest the following thread on dri-devel: From: Dax Kelson <redacted> Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 15:32:13 -0600 Subject: [Dri-devel] Docs for R300/350 now R420 chips out? I enjoy working on drivers for which the datasheets are publically available. I do not buy your "corporate" model at all. [...]
Having a central place for network drivers would be nice for bugtracking
bugzilla.kernel.org + google + testers harassment. -- Ueimor