Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2004-05-24

Re: RFC: Network Device Driver Group proposal

From: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Date: 2004-05-24 21:17:32

Luis R. Rodriguez [off-list ref] :
[...]
on drivers. Basically I feel we are doing great but we're lacking that
*corporate* entity any commercial operating system has. Who do
manufacturers seek out to provide/sell source base/NDA's to so that a
driver can be written for our OS? No one... On behalf of who does a
kernel hacker send out an e-mail to a company requesting specs to write
a driver? The DRI/Xfree86 project have an advantage because of this -- 
they represent a group who has done tons of great work and companies 
tend to trust groups more than individuals. Of course, many companies
May I suggest the following thread on dri-devel:

From: Dax Kelson <redacted>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 15:32:13 -0600
Subject: [Dri-devel] Docs for R300/350 now R420 chips out?

I enjoy working on drivers for which the datasheets are publically
available. I do not buy your "corporate" model at all.

[...]
Having a central place for network drivers would be nice for bugtracking
bugzilla.kernel.org + google + testers harassment.

--
Ueimor
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help