Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here...
From: Chris Friesen <hidden>
Date: 2004-04-22 15:43:38
Also in:
lkml
From: Chris Friesen <hidden>
Date: 2004-04-22 15:43:38
Also in:
lkml
alex@pilosoft.com wrote:
Nevertheless, number of packets to kill the session is still *large* (under "best-case" for attacker, you need to send 2^30 packets)...
I though the whole point of this vulnerability was that you "only" needed to send 64K packets, not 2^30. Chris