Re: [PATCH] make lock/release_sock fast calls
From: David S. Miller <hidden>
Date: 2004-04-01 07:07:17
From: David S. Miller <hidden>
Date: 2004-04-01 07:07:17
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:24:07 -0800 Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref] wrote:
lock_sock and release_sock are no longer inline, but they are called in the critical path of many operations, so it makes sense to use register based fastcall.
I think I'll add this change when 2.6.6 opens up. Someone haggled about CONFIG_REGPARM, but that argument is crap. We have "FASTCALL()" for a reason, and CONFIG_REGPARM does not obviate it.