Re: [RFC, PATCH 4/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy lookup
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2004-03-19 21:05:25
Also in:
netfilter-devel
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 05:34:58PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:quoted
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 05:32:23PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:quoted
@@ -635,7 +636,6 @@#ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK fl.nl_u.ip4_u.fwmark = (*pskb)->nfmark; #endif - fl.proto = iph->protocol;Better call __ip_route_output_key rather than not setting proto because you'll need proto in xfrm_lookup.
Right, you're calling decode_session below which is much better.
quoted
quoted
@@ -661,6 +661,20 @@if ((*pskb)->dst->error) return -1; + +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM + if (!(IPCB(*pskb)->flags & IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED)) { + struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *afinfo; + + afinfo = xfrm_policy_get_afinfo(AF_INET); + if (afinfo != NULL) { + afinfo->decode_session(*pskb, &fl); + xfrm_policy_put_afinfo(afinfo); + if (xfrm_lookup(&(*pskb)->dst, &fl, (*pskb)->sk, 0) != 0) + return -1; + } + } +#endifIf we can reinject transport packets then we can move this back into the if clause.I don't understand the relationship to transport mode packets. I used an
Actually it was me who was confused. ip_route_me_harder can be called
on both incoming/outgoing packets. That's what the if clause is trying
to determine. You should only call xfrm_lookup on the outgoing path.
So this should be moved back to the if clause above:
fl.proto = iph->protocol;
lookup = __ip_route_output_key;
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
if (!(IPCB(*pskb)->flags & IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED)) {
lookup = ip_route_output_key;
do_decode
}
#endif
if (lookup(&rt, &fl) != 0)
return -1;
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt