From: jamal [off-list ref]
   Date: 26 Jan 2004 09:46:16 -0500

   On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 07:02, Patrick McHardy wrote:
   > The last issue is the License: The altq version is released under a
   > BSD-style License without advertising clause (the original authors
   > kindly agreed to remove it). It is my understanding that this is
   > compatible with the GPL, and because the code includes some minor
   > amounts of GPL'ed code the correct License is GPL and not
   > Dual BSD/GPL. I would be glad if someone can confirm that this is
   > correct.
   
   This is probably the most contentious issue (given say current SCO
   stoopidty).
   Have you talked to the original author on this? I think granting you
   written consent to move to GPL may be sufficient.

Yes, let's get this worked out before we stuff it into the tree :)

Patrick, please ask the original author if it's OK to make your
instance of the Linux port pure GPL'd.