Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2004-01-11

Re: Realtek 8169 Lock-ups

From: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Date: 2004-01-11 11:49:57

Jeff Garzik [off-list ref] :
[...]
Have those already been tested?
Yes. Tester (damouse) included in Cc: list.
The patches improves the situation so that it is possible to bring the
interface up and send/receive traffic but something clearly smashes the
stack (if someone wants to check, .jpg panic and r8169 module available
at http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/debug).

After the latest days of "patch/patch -R/change line foo into bar/...",
I have rediffed the whole serie of changes against 2.6.1 so M. Damouse can
test an identified set of patches and isolate the misbehaving one(s). It is
available at http://www.fr.zoreil.com/linux/kernel/2.6.x/2.6.1.

If people can reproduce the tests that M. Damouse made, it should look like:
apply r8169-dma-api-tx.patch
apply r8169-dma-api-rx-buffers.patch
apply r8169-dma-api-rx-buffers-ahum.patch
apply r8169-rx-fill-typo.patch
apply r8169-start-xmit-fixes.patch
apply r8169-dma-api-tx-buffers.patch
apply r8169-rx_copybreak.patch
-> So far, so good, no regression from classical driver
apply r8169-mac-phy-version.patch
apply r8169-buggy-devinitdata.patch
-> Seems fine but panics after a few ko of traffic

<blink>Confirmation, anyone ?</blink>

The set contains two extra/untested patches [*] wrt 2.6.1-bk1-netdev2. 
No need to push these further until the current issues are fixed imho.

M. Pollock's problems look different:
- they do not depend on the driver used;
- they seem timing/smp related (mobile computer + p4 HT).

[*]
r8169-addr-high.patch
r8169-ethtool-introduction.patch

--
Ueimor
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help