Re: IPSEC and MPLS priority for 2.6?
From: Pekka Savola <hidden>
Date: 2003-12-18 15:36:21
From: Pekka Savola <hidden>
Date: 2003-12-18 15:36:21
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, James R. Leu wrote:
quoted
(Btw, there's a lot of claimed IPR on MPLS technologies, not sure if that's a problem or not.)Up till now there has not been any issues. Most of the IPR claims state that the holder will grant "a non-exclusive license under reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions".
FWIW, that's legal mumbo jumbo which means nothing in practice. Charging 100$ fee per computer where the code is run or deployed is counted as reasonable :-) Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings