Hello Dave,

I just spotted the second bug too. (For those interested it is described
in the patch).
Please revert the small patch I sent you yesterday before applying the
new one. It contains yesterday's one too (it is because it is for 2.4 too).
Please apply it against both 2.4.23 and 2.6.0-test10. It should apply
cleanly in 2.4.23 case and with some offsets to 2.6.0-test10.

Patch comments:
- Fixed oops in debugging of enqueue/requeue.
- Fixed oops in htb_destroy.

Note that I tested 2.6 only because I'm still downloading 2.4.22 patch
on my slow line. I just wanted to sent the patch ASAP. I'll inform you
about result later but I expect no problems.

-------------------------------
    Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
  http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/

On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, David S. Miller wrote:

On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 15:18:37 +0100 (CET)
devik [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I discovered reason of the first Daniel's OOPS. It is change
which was not forward-ported to 2.6.
It is attached.

Thanks a lot for tracking this problem down Devik.

Patch applied, thanks again.