Re: [PATCH 2.6] pci.ids for e1000

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:07:17PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:

Jeff Garzik wrote:

quoted

The general idea is to keep 2.4, 2.6, and pciids.sf.net in sync.

is there sync between 2.4, 2.6, and pciids.sf.net ?  ;-)

Linus and Marcelo should not accept patches against pci.ids,
all updates should go to pciids.sf.net. And every X time
to do a sync with 2.4 and 2.6.

I'd love to see a volunteer to try to sync these files up and routinely
send updates to the pci maintainers of the different kernel trees.

Anyone?

I also agree with David, it's completly acceptable for drivers to add
their ids to this file when they are added to the kernel tree.

thanks,

greg k-h