Re: [PATCH 2.6] pci.ids for e1000

From
Greg KH <hidden>
Date
2003-09-30 23:52:06
Also in
lkml
Reply to
Xose Vazquez Perez, 2003-09-28
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:07:17PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
quoted
The general idea is to keep 2.4, 2.6, and pciids.sf.net in sync.
is there sync between 2.4, 2.6, and pciids.sf.net ?  ;-)

Linus and Marcelo should not accept patches against pci.ids,
all updates should go to pciids.sf.net. And every X time
to do a sync with 2.4 and 2.6.
I'd love to see a volunteer to try to sync these files up and routinely
send updates to the pci maintainers of the different kernel trees.

Anyone?

I also agree with David, it's completly acceptable for drivers to add
their ids to this file when they are added to the kernel tree.

thanks,

greg k-h
Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, last reply 2003-09-30
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help