Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5

On Tuesday 16 September 2003 04:11 am, Jay Vosburgh wrote:

quoted

quoted

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:57:26 -0700

Jay Vosburgh [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

     My only concern is a matter of timing; we're right at the
end of synchronizing the 2.4 and 2.6 bonding sources.  Once
that's settled (hopefully in a few days, the last patch set for
2.4 came in this morning), then removing them from that header
and the bonding code should be fine.

No problem.  Just push the change to Jeff then after you're
done merging stuff around, ok?

        Will do.

I'm on the verge of finishing my cleanup set re-do. Now that Amir sent 
all the synching stuff, I could put that one in as well, and it would 
fit on both 2.4 and 2.6.

	I was going to add it on to the end of the clean up set, but
if you want to do it, go ahead.  Nobody seems to have objected to
removing the _OLD stuff, which I view as a good thing.

	-J

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com