Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup

Francois Romieu wrote:

2 - I am not completely convinced that the "/* re-check under lock */" 
    comment is really useful either: the lock statement is on the line before.

I thought that without the comment someone might think that the second
"if()" wasn't needed (since we had just checked the same value against
NULL a few lines up)

-Mitch