Re: socket(7) error?
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2003-08-21 10:42:44
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:19:38AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Hi. There's a bug report from Martin Pool against manpages-dev suggesting
the following paragraph from socket(7) is incorrect:
SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO
Specify the sending or receiving timeouts until reporting an
error. They are fixed to a protocol specific setting in Linux
and cannot be read or written. Their functionality can be emu-
lated using alarm(2) or setitimer(2).
He says:
In fact, these options do seem to be at least partially implemented
in Linux 2.4.20. You can at least set and retrieve a value against
a socket, and it does seem to affect the (complex) network scheduling
code.It was correct when the manpage was written, but wasn't updated later when option was implemented. -Andi