On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:51:51 +0300
Eran Mann [off-list ref] wrote:
David S. Miller wrote:
quoted
Can someone check out 2.6.x?
It looks the same in 2.6.0-test3. The patch applies (with small offsets)
and works (the oops is much harder to trigger in 2.6.x since
PROC_NDYNAMIC is increased to 16384, I had to reduce it to 4096 to
trigger the oops).
Thanks, I've put the patch into my 2.6.x tree.