Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5

In message [ref],"David S. Miller" writes:

quoted

(and how does __inline__ work
when its the timer function?)

If you take the address of a function marked inline,
gcc outputs a non-inline of the function.

i figured that.  tagging this function inline is essentially
pointless.  (which was sort of my point in a roundabout way)