Re: [PATCH] xfrm ip6ip6
From: David S. Miller <hidden>
Date: 2003-06-01 08:34:52
From: James Morris [off-list ref] Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 02:01:42 +1000 (EST) We need to either filter them out or make sure they are displayed as ipip. Part of the answer will depend on whether we want to expose xfrm-based ipip tunnels for general use, or only use them internally for ipcomp. I think it is an error to extend PF_KEY for our Linux purposes. Our API here is basically defined to be whatever is in KAME :-) However, setkey should filter entries it does not understand. Currently I see no use for exposing these tunnel transforms outside of the kernel. Mobile IPV6, if it decides to use xfrm6_tunnel, can configure them itself in the kernel side support. Or, if user side is more appropriate for MIPV6 access, we may allow it to use xfrm netlink interface somehow.