From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 [off-list ref]
   Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 02:31:58 +0900 (JST)

I think this idea needs a slight modification:

   +#define fl_sport	uli_u.ports.sport
   +#define fl_dport	uli_u.ports.dport
   +#define fl_type		uli_u.icmpt.type
   +#define fl_code		uli_u.icmpt.code

Other protocols like DecNET will use these areas, and I already know
that DecNET defines it's own struct member of the flow uli_u union
that itself has members named sport and dport.

How about the following instead?

+#define fl_ports_sport	uli_u.ports.sport
+#define fl_ports_dport	uli_u.ports.dport
+#define fl_icmp_type		uli_u.icmpt.type
+#define fl_icmp_code		uli_u.icmpt.code

Ok?