On 7 March 2003 02:29, Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 23:19, Russell King wrote:
quoted
"klibc doesnt really matter"
I'd prefer not to have to have thousands of special programs around
just to be able to boot my machines, especially when it was all in-
kernel up until this point.
klibc yes, dietlibc with random other garbage in some random
filesystem which'd need maintaining - no thanks.
You can build the dhcp client with glibc static into your initrd.
Anything built static against glibs tends to be 400K+.
--
vda