Re: cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size)

Alan wrote:

I've had no reports I remember about it breaking stuff, and several that
it fixed stuff. It also seems to match the documentation. Its been in -ac
for ages

Andrew wrote:

I've seen no reports either way, and appear to have misplaced the
datasheet.

May as well run with it.

Sounds good.  Dave, whatever your preference for patching handling is, 
is all good.  I guess yourself, myself, and akpm are all patch-mongering 
candidates...

	Jeff