Re: SIOCADDMULTI for unicast broken
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Date: 2003-01-06 15:00:33
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Date: 2003-01-06 15:00:33
Jeff Garzik [off-list ref] writes:
No! procfs additions are discouraged. sysfs in 2.5.x if you _must_ do this, but SIOCDEVPRIVATE or just flat out maintaining a kernel patch against a stable kernel tree would be much preferred, I think.
Still, SIOCDEVPRIVATE should _not_, in my opinion, be used for anything but hacks. For example, we should stop using it for configuring ethernet bridges: net/bridge/br_device.c: if (cmd != SIOCDEVPRIVATE) -- Krzysztof Halasa Network Administrator