Re: NAPI-ized tulip patch against 2.4.20-rc1
From: Donald Becker <hidden>
Date: 2002-11-06 20:47:43
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Ben Greear wrote:
quoted
The trivial case is a module option that sets a variable replacing RX_RING_SIZE / TX_RING_SIZE.. The passed-in value shouldn't be used directly: - many drivers have upper and lower bounds - the size can only be changed when the rings are initialized, which occurs when the interface starts.So, adjusting the ring size would require stopping and starting the NIC? Is that a full bounce (including auto-negotiation)?
Most chips do not require bouncing the link when the interface is cycled down/up. That's not to say that some drivers don't reset the link -- it's easier for the driver writer to write the code that way, and doing the link reset can mask other problems.
quoted
- users thinking "if 32 is good, 32000 is better"The sad truth is, most NICs/drivers do not perform at high speeds w/out hacking them in various ways. Where to lay the blame (VM, shitty hardware, etc) is debatable, but it doesn't change the results. I do know that 1024 is better than 32 for high speeds on muliple ports, on my NICs.
I can see that changing the parameters is a quick, ad hoc solution. This list should focus on identifying the problems, rather than just patching in work-arounds. -- Donald Becker becker@scyld.com Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com 410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Scyld Beowulf cluster system Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993