Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?

From
bert hubert <hidden>
Date
2002-10-23 16:54:58
Also in
lkml
Reply to
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, 2002-10-23
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:42:48PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
quoted
The e1000 can very well do hardware checksumming on transmit.

The missing piece of the puzzle is that his application is not
using sendfile(), without which no transmit checksum offload
can take place.
As far as I've understood, sendfile() won't do much good with large files. Is 
this right?
I still refuse to believe that a 1.8GHz Pentium4 can only checksum
250megabits/second. MD Raid5 does better and they probably don't use a
checksum as braindead as that used by TCP.

If the checksumming is not the problem, the copying is, which would be a
weakness of your hardware. The function profiled does both the copying and
the checksumming.

But 250megabits/second also seems low.

Dave? 

Regards,

bert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 7 authors, last reply 2002-10-24
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help