On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:24:38PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Derek Fawcus [off-list ref]
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:29:02 +0100
There are areas where the TAHI tests expect a certain behaviour
when more than one behaviour is acceptable.
Great, that's what I was trying to find out.
Now I just need to know if this link-local prefix case
is one such issue. :-)
That I can't answer, since I've not had that one specifically thrown at
me as a test failure condition.
However, in a previous email I did indicate the two different ICMPv6
errors that could be generated. So I guess it's a case of see if this
was a TAHI failure, and if so then is it that TAHI want's to get a
'no route to destination' when 'address unreachable' should suffice.
DF