Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <hidden>
Date: 2002-10-09 19:23:33
In article [ref] (at Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:03:29 +0400 (MSD)), kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru says:
quoted
Personally I think the interfaces should be configured with a /64 but there should be a discard route for the whole /10.I agressively agree. :-)
How about this (against 2.4.19 / 2.4.20-pre10)? Index: net/ipv6/addrconf.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/usagi/usagi-backport/linux24/net/ipv6/addrconf.c,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1.20.1 diff -u -r1.1.1.1.20.1 addrconf.c
--- net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2002/09/27 17:17:06 1.1.1.1.20.1
+++ net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2002/10/09 18:18:34@@ -783,6 +783,7 @@ struct in6_addr addr; ipv6_addr_set(&addr, __constant_htonl(0xFE800000), 0, 0, 0); + addrconf_prefix_route(&addr, 10, dev, 0, RTF_ADDRCONF|RTF_REJECT); addrconf_prefix_route(&addr, 64, dev, 0, RTF_ADDRCONF); }
--
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA