Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*
From: Ben Greear <hidden>
Date: 2002-09-29 19:32:38
Richard Gooch wrote:
Ben Greear writes:quoted
Richard Gooch wrote:quoted
Hi, all. For a while now I've noticed poor performance with gige cards under 2.4.19 and 2.4.20-pre*. At first I thought it was because of the cheap-ass Addtron cards I bought (these use the ns83820 chip). But now that the Intel E1000 cards are pretty cheap too, I've grabbed a couple (part number: PWLA8390MT) and see the same problem. In fact, the E1000 cards are no better than the Addtron cards. I'm using the D-Link DGS-1008T 8-port gige switch. MTU=1500 bytes.Try setting the TxDescriptors=4096 RxDescriptors=1024 when loading the e1000 module, that helps tremendously when using smaller packets.Didn't help at all. Just to summarise, I've got: options e1000 TxDescriptors=4096 RxDescriptors=1024 net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 262144 262144 262144 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 262144 262144 262144 MTU=1500 I'm doing read(2)/write(2) to/from a user-space buffer over a TCP socket with 256 KiB buffer size. Is the E1000 supposed to have hardware interrupt mitigation (thus avoiding the need for NAPI)?
NAPI did not greatly improve the performance I saw with larger packets, but it did help with smaller (say, 60 byte) packets. One other thing I saw with TCP connections: They started off slow, but after a few seconds they were reacing their peak throughput. How long are you running your test? Ben
Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-- Ben Greear [off-list ref] <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear