Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2002-06-12

Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets

From: Richard Guy Briggs <hidden>
Date: 2002-06-12 04:09:43
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 08:41:19PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
   From: Bill Davidsen [off-list ref]
   Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:41:16 -0400 (EDT)

     Actually your arguments sound like you have a solution to your problem
   and you want everyone to use it even if it doesn't help them. Have you
   some emotional tie to SNMP, like being an author?
Basically Bill, if you don't like this policy, fork the code.  That is
one of the strengths (and weaknesses) of open source.  If your tree
works better and gets wider use, then something about it must be better.
If not, then maybe it wasn't.  This community works on reputation
capital (and some diplomacy).
After a comment like this, I have no interest in listening to anything
else you have to say.  I've been maintaining the Linux networking for
5 or more years now, and the most important thing I do is say no to
changes.

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
	slainte mhath, RGB

-- 
Richard Guy Briggs           --    ~\                 Auto-Free Ottawa! Canada
<www.TriColour.net>            --    \@       @           <www.flora.org/afo/>
No Internet Wiretapping!        --   _\\/\%___\\/\%        Vote! -- <Green.ca>
<www.FreeSWAN.org>_______GTVS6#790__(*)_______(*)(*)_______<www.Marillion.com>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help