On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:17:59 +0100 Maxime Chevallier wrote:
- for (i = 0; i < SGMII_PCS_SW_RESET_TIMEOUT; i++) {
- if (!(tse_pcs_read(tse_pcs, MII_BMCR) & BMCR_RESET))
- return 0;
- udelay(1);
- }
-
- return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ return read_poll_timeout(tse_pcs_read, bmcr, (bmcr & BMCR_RESET),
+ 10, SGMII_PCS_SW_RESET_TIMEOUT, 1,
+ tse_pcs, MII_BMCR);
You say "no functional change intended" in the cover letter but you
switch from udelay to usleep and change timeouts here. I presume this
is intentional but should be mentioned in the commit message, I think.