On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:46:38AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but actually the
map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to keep both.
Remove memcg_shrinker_map_size since shrinker_nr_max is also used by iterating the
bit map.
Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <redacted>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index e4ddaaaeffe2..641077b09e5d 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -185,8 +185,10 @@ static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+static int shrinker_nr_max;
-static int memcg_shrinker_map_size;
+#define NR_MAX_TO_SHR_MAP_SIZE(nr_max) \
+ (DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long))
How about something like this?
static inline int shrinker_map_size(int nr_items)
{
return DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_items, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long);
}
I think it look less cryptic.
The rest of the patch looks good to me.
Thanks!