Thread (51 messages) 51 messages, 8 authors, 2017-08-01

Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] smack: Refactor to remove bprm_secureexec hook

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-26 03:58:01
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:
The Smack bprm_secureexec hook can be merged with the bprm_set_creds
hook since it's dealing with the same information, and all of the details
are finalized during the first call to the bprm_set_creds hook via
prepare_binprm() (subsequent calls due to binfmt_script, etc, are ignored
via bprm->called_set_creds).

Here, the test can just happen at the end of the bprm_set_creds hook,
and the bprm_secureexec hook can be dropped.

Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
How does this look to you, Casey? I've only got a few unreviewed
patches in this series. Two touch Smack. :)

Thanks!

-Kees
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 21 ++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 7d4b2e221124..4f1967be3d20 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -950,6 +950,10 @@ static int smack_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
        bsp->smk_task = isp->smk_task;
        bprm->per_clear |= PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID;

+       /* Decide if this is a secure exec. */
+       if (bsp->smk_task != bsp->smk_forked)
+               bprm->secureexec = 1;
+
        return 0;
 }
@@ -967,22 +971,6 @@ static void smack_bprm_committing_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
                current->pdeath_signal = 0;
 }

-/**
- * smack_bprm_secureexec - Return the decision to use secureexec.
- * @bprm: binprm for exec
- *
- * Returns 0 on success.
- */
-static int smack_bprm_secureexec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
-{
-       struct task_smack *tsp = current_security();
-
-       if (tsp->smk_task != tsp->smk_forked)
-               return 1;
-
-       return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * Inode hooks
  */
@@ -4646,7 +4634,6 @@ static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {

        LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_set_creds, smack_bprm_set_creds),
        LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_committing_creds, smack_bprm_committing_creds),
-       LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_secureexec, smack_bprm_secureexec),

        LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_alloc_security, smack_inode_alloc_security),
        LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_free_security, smack_inode_free_security),
--
2.7.4


-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help