On 06/29/16 at 06:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:

Am Mittwoch, 29 Juni 2016, 15:47:51 schrieb Dave Young:

quoted

On 06/28/16 at 07:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
index e8acb2b43dd9..e16d845d587f 100644
--- a/include/linux/kexec.h
+++ b/include/linux/kexec.h

@@ -146,7 +146,30 @@ struct kexec_file_ops {

      kexec_verify_sig_t *verify_sig;
 
 #endif
 };

-#endif
+
+/**
+ * struct kexec_buf - parameters for finding a place for a buffer in

memory + * @image:   kexec image in which memory to search.
+ * @mem:     On return will have address of the buffer in memory.
+ * @memsz:   Size for the buffer in memory.
+ * @buf_align:       Minimum alignment needed.
+ * @buf_min: The buffer can't be placed below this address.
+ * @buf_max: The buffer can't be placed above this address.
+ * @top_down:        Allocate from top of memory.
+ */
+struct kexec_buf {
+     struct kimage *image;
+     unsigned long mem;
+     unsigned long memsz;
+     unsigned long buf_align;
+     unsigned long buf_min;
+     unsigned long buf_max;
+     bool top_down;
+};

Rethink about the first patch, you dropped the user buffer in kexec_buf
But later your passing IMA digests buffer patchset may need use it.

So keep it in kexec_buf should be better.

I'm not following. The IMA buffer patchset doesn't use kexec_locate_mem_hole 
nor struct kexec_buf.

It does not use kexec_locate_mem_hole, but the buffer being passed is
very similar to a kexec_buf struct, no? 

So you may refactor kexec_add_buffer and your new function to pass only kimage
and a kbuf, it will be better than passing all those arguments separately.

quoted

For the IMA buffer patchset I'm still reading and learning the
background, will reply them later.

Thank you!

[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

Thanks
Dave