Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2014-06-03 14:40:03
Also in:
linux-pm
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2014-06-03 14:40:03
Also in:
linux-pm
On 28 May 2014 23:08, Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:
Whatever - I don't think the particular code makes any practical difference. We would need to audit existing users who don't have a REGULATOR dependency for breakage though.
Exactly what kind of drivers are we looking to fix here? These might be the possible cases: - We are checking 'regulator pointer' before calling and don't need to handle anything there.. - drivers depend on CONFIG_REGULATOR and so again we don't need to handle anything - None of above are true and drivers aren't checking return value of regulator_set_voltage() OR They are checking it and failing when it failed.. What do we want to do in these cases?