On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 07:47 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:24:41AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:09:40PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:54:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:54 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:

quoted

Not sure I see much difference in aesthetics between the three approaches,

quoted

but am willing to switch over to a generally agreed-upon scheme.

Steve, could I get an ack from you on the patch I sent?

I acked it, but do you just want me to take the patch? I'm getting ready
for another 3.7 push to tip.

Up to Paul.  What would make it easiest to coordinate that patch and the
corresponding bits in the RCU patch series?

All I need to do is to eventually remove the exports, correct?
If so, full speed ahead!

Sounds like you could go ahead and remove the exports now, and just make
sure Steve's push goes in before yours.

Is there any rush to do this? I just plan on pushing it for 3.7.

Paul, you just push your changes through tip, right? Then we can just
let Ingo know. I could even make the patch a separate branch, that Ingo
can pull into the RCU branch too.

-- Steve