Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] virtio_balloon: introduce migration primitives to balloon pages
From: Mel Gorman <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-15 11:16:58
Also in:
linux-mm
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:01:08PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:48:39AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:25:28PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:05:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:11:13PM -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:51:39PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
What I think you should do is use rcu for access. And here sync rcu before freeing. Maybe an overkill but at least a documented synchronization primitive, and it is very light weight.I liked your suggestion on barriers, as well.I have not thought about this as deeply as I shouold but is simply rechecking the mapping under the pages_lock to make sure the page is still a balloon page an option? i.e. use pages_lock to stabilise page->mapping.To clarify, are you concerned about cost of rcu_read_lock for non balloon pages?Not as such, but given the choice between introducing RCU locking and rechecking page->mapping under a spinlock I would choose the latter as it is more straight-forward.OK but checking it how? page->mapping == balloon_mapping does not scale to multiple balloons,
I was thinking of exactly that page->mapping == balloon_mapping check. As I do not know how many active balloon drivers there might be I cannot guess in advance how much of a scalability problem it will be.
so I hoped we can switch to page->mapping->flags & BALLOON_MAPPING or some such, but this means we dereference it outside the lock ...
That also sounded like future stuff to me that would be justified with profiling if necessary. Personally I would have started with the spinlock and a simple check and moved to RCU later when either scalability was a problem or it was found there was a need to stabilise whether a page was a balloon page or not outside a spinlock. This is not a NAK to the idea and I'm not objecting to RCU being used now if that is what is really desired. I just suspect it's making the series more complex than it needs to be right now. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs