Hi Sjur,

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Sjur Brændeland [off-list ref] wrote:

I realize that we have the same issue with the virtio rings.
Are there any way we can assign the device address of the virtio rings
to the resource table in shared memory?

It's a gap we have today, but it should definitely be fixed.

Or do we have to calculate the
virtio ring addresses based on number rings and the number of elements
in the ring?

No, that's not the long term intention. It can be used as an interim
solution, but I expect we do fix this and start supporting dynamic
assignments of the vrings locations at some point.

Thanks,
Ohad.