[PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 1/6] ASoC: ab8500: Inform SoC Core that we have our own I/O arrangements · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 2/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Sergei Shtylyov <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v2] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, no matching driver name for, 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
[PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-08-01
[PATCH 6/6] ASoC: Ux500: Move MSP pinctrl setup into the MSP driver · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 6/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
[PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 2/6] ASoC: ab8500: Inform SoC Core that we have our own I/O arrangements · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-03
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-04
RE: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Ola Lilja <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2012-08-10
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31

Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2012-08-01 13:32:18
Also in: alsa-devel, linux-arm-kernel

On Wednesday 01 August 2012, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

Looks like you're adding the same call to each of the three cases:
mop500, snowball and hrefv60+. How about moving it before or after
the if/elseif block?

The Snowball one is different 'mop500_msp_init' -> 'mop500_of_msp_init'.

Ah, I see. Is there a problem in always using mop500_of_msp_init then?
I would guess that this just means you'd have to put the msp into the
device tree files, which don't yet exist for mop500 and hrefv60.

	Arnd

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help