Re: [PATCH 1/5] user_hooks: New user hooks subsystem
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2012-08-01 12:43:09
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 14:28 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:14:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
So we probably need to generalize a bit more. Some naming based on
"code domain"?
struct code_domain {
int is_tracking;
enum {
in_kernel,
in_user,
in_guest
} state;
}
Is there a fundamental difference between 'in_user' and 'in_guest'
though?
-- Steve