Re: [PATCH] pwm-backlight: add regulator and GPIO support
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-29 16:04:56
Also in:
linux-fbdev, linux-tegra
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-29 16:04:56
Also in:
linux-fbdev, linux-tegra
On 06/29/2012 07:22 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Add support for an optional power regulator and enable/disable GPIO. This scheme is commonly used in embedded systems.
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
- dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "got pwm for backlight\n"); -
That seems like an unrelated change?
@@ -231,6 +271,22 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (data->pwm_period_ns > 0) pwm_set_period(pb->pwm, data->pwm_period_ns); + + pb->power_reg = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "power");
There's an extra blank line there.
+ if (IS_ERR(pb->power_reg))
+ return PTR_ERR(pb->power_reg);
+
+ pb->enable_gpio = -EINVAL;
+ if (data->use_enable_gpio) {
+ ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, data->enable_gpio,
+ GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "backlight_enable");
+ if (ret)
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
+ "error %d requesting control gpio\n", ret);Shouldn't that be a hard error? If the user specified that some GPIO be used, and the GPIO could not be requested, shouldn't the driver fail to initialize?
+ else + pb->enable_gpio = data->enable_gpio;
Aside from that, this looks good to me.