Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: 2007-08-30 11:58:46
Also in:
linux-wireless, netdev
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2007-08-30 · Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2 · Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
- 2007-08-30 · Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2 · David Newall <hidden>
- 2007-08-30 · Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2 · Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
- 2007-08-30 · Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2 · Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
- 2007-08-29 · Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2 · Michael Buesch <hidden>
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 15:13 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
How about asking for changes to be dual-licenced too ?
In theory, that could work, but in practice relying on functions that the Linux kernel offers in GPLv2-only headers etc. will make the result GPLv2 anyway, and disentangling it would be a nightmare. johannes
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 190 bytes