Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages
From: Jay Lan <hidden>
Date: 2005-02-25 17:32:24
From: Jay Lan <hidden>
Date: 2005-02-25 17:32:24
Andrew Morton wrote:
Kaigai Kohei [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
In my understanding, what Andrew Morton said is "If target functionality can implement in user space only, then we should not modify the kernel-tree".fork, exec and exit upcalls sound pretty good to me. As long as a) they use the same common machinery and b) they are next-to-zero cost if something is listening on the netlink socket but no accounting daemon is running. Question is: is this sufficient for CSA?
Yes, fork, exec, and exit upcalls are sufficient for CSA. The framework i proposed earlier should satisfy your requirement a and b, and provides upcalls needed by BSD, ELSA and CSA. Maybe i misunderstood your concern of the 'very light weight' framework i proposed besides being "overkill"? - jay