Thread (434 messages) 434 messages, 39 authors, 2004-08-28

Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0

From: Lee Revell <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-16 03:14:57

On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 23:14, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Lee Revell [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
i've attached mlock-test2.cc that should test this theory. The code
breaks up the mlock-ed region into 8 equal pieces and does mlock() on
them separately. It's basically a lock-break done in user-space. Does
this change the nature of xruns?
This does change the xruns.  I have to `mlock-test2 8000' to produce
any xrun at all, and that only produces a 2-300 usec xrun.  With
mlockall-test the threshold to produce an xrun was ~1500.
did you try mlock-test.cc too? Just to make sure that mlock-test.cc is
equivalent to mlockall-test.cc.
That attachment was also missing.

Lee
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help