On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 10:10:44 +0800
Shuai Xue [off-list ref] wrote:

It's a pure comment cosmetic, not worth a respin on its own. But for the

I don't know. I've respinned for better comments before.

rest of the feedback on this series (the frame-record metadata contract
in patch 2 and the dead state->regs field / Call Trace output change in
patch 6) are the ones actually worth a new version.

Just to get the routing straight: are you planning to pick this one up
through the tracing tree on its own?

It feels like a good candidate for that -- it's an independent
regression fix (Fixes: 0ca1724b56af) that breaks *all* RISC-V dynamic
ftrace, not just livepatch, so it shouldn't have to wait on the rest of
the livepatch series.

As it affects RISCV and I don't have a RISCV to test, I would feel more
comfortable with it going through a RISCV tree that can test the patch.

Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve