Re: [PATCH v8 7/9] livepatch: Improve the search performance of module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol()
From: Jiri Olsa <hidden>
Date: 2022-11-14 10:31:59
Also in:
linux-modules, lkml
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 06:00:38PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
On 2022/11/14 17:27, Jiri Olsa wrote:quoted
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:50:25PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:quoted
On 2022/11/14 15:47, Jiri Olsa wrote:quoted
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 04:49:19PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:quoted
Currently we traverse all symbols of all modules to find the specified function for the specified module. But in reality, we just need to find the given module and then traverse all the symbols in it.hi, sorry for delayed answer, I did not notice this until Stephen's email about merge issue with recent bpf change [1]quoted
Let's add a new parameter 'const char *modname' to function module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol(), then we can compare the module nameswe have use case for iterating all modules and their symbols when we want to resolve passed addresses for tracing we don't have 'modname' that we could pass, we need to iterate all modules so perhaps this could be made optional like with passing NULL for modname?The deletion of modname was suggested by Petr Mladek. The reason is that everyone passes modname as NULL, there was no actual demand at the time. https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/9/20/682quoted
quoted
directly in this function and call hook 'fn' after matching. And the parameter 'struct module *' in the hook 'fn' can also be deleted.we need 'struct module *' argument in the callback as well because we are taking the module reference if we trace function in it, so it wont get unloaded please let me know if I should do the change or can help in any wayIt seems that we should take the module reference before invoking callback and put it after it is called, without passing modname.we take the module ref only if we (callback) find the traced address in the module, we don't have the module object before jirkaDo it in function module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol()? But I just saw that mutex_lock(&module_mutex) protection is already provided in this function. So reference counting protection may not be required.
we take the module ref so it won't unload even outside of the module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol function jirka