Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
[RFC PATCH v5 0/2] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks · <hidden> · 2021-05-26
[RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder · <hidden> · 2021-05-26
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder · Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> · 2021-06-24
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2021-06-24
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden> · 2021-06-25
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2021-06-25
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden> · 2021-06-25
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden> · 2021-06-25
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden> · 2021-06-26
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder · Josh Poimboeuf <hidden> · 2021-06-29
[RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list · <hidden> · 2021-05-26
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2021-06-04
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden> · 2021-06-04
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2021-06-04
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden> · 2021-06-04
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list · Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> · 2021-06-16
RE: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list · nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com <hidden> · 2021-06-16
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden> · 2021-06-16
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2021-06-04
Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden> · 2021-06-04

From: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-04 20:44:44
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

Hi Mark Rutland,

Could you please review this patch series when you get a chance?
I would really like to get a confirmation from you that there
are no gaps in this.

Thanks in advance!

Madhavan

On 6/4/21 10:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:49:15PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:

quoted

From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <redacted>

There are a number of places in kernel code where the stack trace is not
reliable. Enhance the unwinder to check for those cases and mark the
stack trace as unreliable. Once all of the checks are in place, the unwinder

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help