Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
From: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-09 14:02:51
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-09 14:02:51
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On 4/9/21 6:31 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 02:23:39PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:quoted
On 4/8/21 11:58 AM, Mark Brown wrote:quoted
quoted
This looks good to me however I'd really like someone who has a firmer understanding of what ftrace is doing to double check as it is entirely likely that I am missing cases here, it seems likely that if I am missing stuff it's extra stuff that needs to be added and we're not actually making use of the reliability information yet.quoted
OK. So, do you have some specific reviewer(s) in mind? Apart from yourself, Mark Rutland and Josh Poimboeuf, these are some reviewers I can think of (in alphabetical order):Mainly Mark Rutland, but generally someone else who has looked at ftrace on arm64 in detail. It was mainly a comment to say I wasn't going to do any kind of Reviewed-by but also hadn't spotted any issues.
Understood. Madhavan