Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable

On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:47:11PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:

On 4/1/21 1:53 PM, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:

quoted

Alternatively, I could just move the SYM_INNER_LABEL(ftrace_graph_call..) to outside the ifdef.

Or, even better, I could just use ftrace_call+4 because that would be the return
address for the tracer function at ftrace_call:

I think that would be cleaner. And, I don't need the complicated comments for ftrace_graph_call.

Is this acceptable?

I think either of those should be fine.