Re: 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-24 08:03:25
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 13:45:46 -0600 Josh Poimboeuf [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:36:19PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:quoted
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:23:31 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:51:50 -0600 Josh Poimboeuf [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:05:08AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:quoted
quoted
Of course, one could place probes using absolute addresses of the functions but that would be less convenient. This also affects many livepatch modules where the kernel code can be compiled with -ffunction-sections and each function may end up in a separate section .text.<function_name>. 'perf probe' cannot be used there, except with the absolute addresses. Moreover, if FGKASLR patches are merged (https://lwn.net/Articles/832434/) and the kernel is built with FGKASLR enabled, -ffunction-sections will be used too. 'perf probe' will be unable to see the kernel functions then.Hmm, if the FGKASLAR really randomizes the symbol address, perf-probe should give up "_text-relative" probe for that kernel, and must fallback to the "symbol-based" probe. (Are there any way to check the FGKASLR is on?) The problem of "symbol-based" probe is that local (static) symbols may share a same name sometimes. In that case, it can not find correct symbol. (Maybe I can find a candidate from its size.) Anyway, sometimes the security and usability are trade-off.We had a similar issue with FGKASLR and live patching. The proposed solution is a new linker flag which eliminates duplicates: -z unique-symbol. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391Interesting, but it might not be enough for perf-probe. Since the perf-probe has to handle both dwarf and elf, both must be changed. I think the problem is that the dwarf is generated while compiling, but this -z seems converting elf symbols in linkage. As far as I can see, this appends ".COUNT" suffix to the non-unique symbols in the linkage phase. Is that also applied to dwarf too?Ah, OK. If there is an offline elf binary with symbol map, I can convert DWARF symbol -> address -> offline elf symbol (unique name)-> kallsyms. Currently, it directly converts address by kallsyms, so I will change it to find elf-symbol and solve address by kallsyms in post processing.DWARF sections have references to the ELF symbols, which are renamed by the linker. So DWARF should automatically show the new symbol name.
OK, I'll check what elfutils provides about that information.
And kallsyms is generated after the kernel is linked. So I'm not sure I understand the problem.
Actually, perf-probe currently uses subprogram DIE(Dwarf node) name for the symbol name and post-process tries to find correct symbol name from kallsyms by the address. So I have to change it to find the ELF symbol name from DIE itself. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu [off-list ref]