Re: [PATCHSET RFC v3 0/6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-13 23:34:36
Also in:
io-uring, lkml
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-13 23:34:36
Also in:
io-uring, lkml
Jens, On Tue, Oct 13 2020 at 13:39, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 10/12/20 11:27 AM, Miroslav Benes wrote: I'm continuing to hone the series, what's really missing so far is arch review. Most conversions are straight forward, some I need folks to definitely take a look at (arm, s390). powerpc is also a bit hair right now, but I'm told that 5.10 will kill a TIF flag there, so that'll make it trivial once I rebase on that.
can you pretty please not add that to anything which is not going
through kernel/entry/ ?
The amount of duplicated and differently buggy, inconsistent and
incomplete code in syscall and exception handling is just annoying.
It's perfectly fine if we keep that #ifdeffery around for a while and
encourage arch folks to move over to the generic infrastructure instead
of proliferating the status quo by adding this to their existing pile.
The #ifdef guarding this in set_notify_signal() and other core code
places wants to be:
#if defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY) && defined(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
Thanks,
tglx