Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] serial: serialize asynchronous write wakeups with the port lock

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 02:24:58PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 2:17 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 01:59:06PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 1:53 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 10:45:54AM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 3:33 AM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 04:11:08PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:

quoted

On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 2:44 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 02:25:46PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:

...

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

Some people might want to test the stuff. And sending too often you actually
will get the opposite results, people will be tired to even start reviewing
and/or testing your code as it's changed way too quickly.

My thought process was that people wouldn't want to be testing code that
had known bugs flagged in Sashiko reviews.

Sashiko reviews are not visible in my or any other mailbox. To see them I have
to go to some URL and so on, meaning to waste time to see why on the earth the
new version has been sent.

Maybe the Sashiko reviews are getting caught in spam filtering or something?
They are showing up for me and on the mailing list[0] so I'm a bit confused why
you aren't seeing them. You shouldn't have to go to the web interface[1] to look
up the reviews.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/sashiko-outbox-183574@kernel.org/ (local)

[1] https://sashiko.dev/

quoted

It's better before addressing Sashiko comments,
reply to all people involved and to Sashiko's original email, so it will be
visible in the previous version why you issued (actually about to issue) the
next version.

Hmm, maybe it makes sense to enable recipients in the reply_to config[2]?

It's up to the list owners / subsystem maintainers.

quoted

[2] https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/v.0.6.3/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml#L290

quoted

And before even issuing it, wait for a while, people might
disagree with Sashiko judgement or your replies on how to address that.

I was assuming everyone was seeing the Sashiko reviews getting posted to
the mailing list already. The are ending up in lore so unless someone isn't
subscribed to the list I'm not sure why they wouldn't be seeing those reviews
already.

I assume you already answered your Q. mailing list in this sense doesn't mean
recipients. I think it simply goes to the mailing list without forwarding.

Do we want those reviews going to recipients as well as the mailing list?

For serial patches, we decided to only have it go to the submitter and
the list.

When it goes to the list is it supposed to go to list subscribers as
well or only to lore?

All list subscribers as well, I've watched your interactions just fine
:)

thanks,

greg k-h