Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mm: Unify device DAX and HugeTLB vmemmap population paths
flat view
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Date: 2026-09-30 01:26:34
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Sep 30, 2026, at 05:32, Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote: On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:32:25 +0800 Muchun Song [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This v3 is based on mm-new commit 2ddb90ee544a, which contains v5 of "mm: Switch device DAX to section-based vmemmap optimization" [1]. This series is split out from the earlier, larger series "mm: Generalize HVO for HugeTLB and device DAX" [2]. While the parent series generalizes vmemmap optimization across HugeTLB and device DAX, this subset addresses a single, self-contained step: unifying their vmemmap population paths. After the preceding Device DAX conversion, both HugeTLB and Device DAX describe optimized vmemmap mappings through memory-section metadata and use per-zone shared tail vmemmap pages. The generic code, however, still carries a Device DAX-specific population flag and compound-page population path, along with arguments and helpers needed only by that path. This series first removes VMEMMAP_POPULATE_DAX and moves selection and reference handling for the shared tail page into the common vmemmap population path. It then removes the generic Device DAX-specific compound-page population path and routes section vmemmap population through vmemmap_populate(). The powerpc radix path continues to use its architecture-specific compound-page population implementation for optimizable sections. The remaining patches remove the unused ptpfn argument, open-code vmemmap_populate_address() now that no caller needs its returned PTE, and add a warning for inconsistent zone initialization of shared tail vmemmap pages. This is the fourth smaller step toward the broader HVO generalization. After this series, HugeTLB and Device DAX use the same population model instead of parallel generic paths, while powerpc keeps its architecture-specific implementation.afaict the whole series is "no functional changes intended". Apart from [6/6]'s new WARN_ON.
Yes.
And [3/6] is the one which could cause unintended fuctional changes!
Understood. However, the resulting vmemmap layout is intended to remain unchanged.
Thanks. I'll queue it. Reluctantly. We're up to 688 MM patches this cycle and it's time to stop.
Thanks for taking it despite the load. Muchun, Thanks.